Chat with our sales team
Whole Network Most Recent TOP10 Basics Best Practice Intelligence Resources

 

Legal Analysis of Anti-Outsourcing Bill

Filed in archive Outsourcing Pros and Cons by on April 19, 2004

The first legal analysis of anti-outsourcing bill has been released by National Foundation for American Policy (NFAP). The main concerns are retaliation from other countries and legal implications for violating the U.S. Constitution and international trade agreements. Download the PDF report directly from NFAP.

Quoted from "First Legal Analysis of State and Federal Outsourcing Legislation Shows Such Bills May Violate the U.S. Constitution" by USNewWire.com:

"The proposed legislation is thus subject to challenge on a variety of grounds," notes the report. A complete copy of the study can be found at www.nfap.net. The National Foundation for American Policy's study Exporting the Law: A Legal Analysis of State and Federal Outsourcing Legislation was authored by Shannon Thyme Klinger and Lynn Sykes, attorneys in the Washington, D.C. office of Alston & Bird. This legal analysis of proposed outsourcing legislation -- the first of its kind -- concludes that:

-- Prohibitions on state contract work being performed overseas are the most legally suspect category of proposed outsourcing legislation, since courts would likely find that such measures improperly intrude on the federal foreign affairs power and violate the U.S. Constitution's Foreign Commerce Clause.

-- State laws offering preferential treatment for in-state interests, though not outright prohibitions, also may violate the U.S. Constitution.

-- State and federal measures that restrict or ban sending U.S. consumers' financial, medical, or other related personal information overseas may be unenforceable under the doctrine of preemption. Existing federal laws, including the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, already address the treatment of certain types of consumer information and permit the sharing of consumer information among affiliated entities without regard to geography and provide mechanisms for recourse against U.S. corporations for failing to take appropriate measures to guard consumer information.

-- The Thomas-Voinovich Amendment, which became law as part of a federal omnibus appropriations act on January 23, 2004, bans certain federal overseas contracts. This law may violate U.S. trade obligations under the World Trade Organization's Government Procurement Agreement because the Government Procurement Agreement prohibits member countries from treating domestic firms less favorably on the basis of "the country of production of the good or service being supplied." At minimum, it appears that the Thomas-Voinovich Amendment, as applied, fails to comply with the non-discrimination and national treatment principles of the Government Procurement Agreement, which may result in an adverse finding by a World Trade Organization dispute settlement body.

-- Various proposed state outsourcing bans as well as other proposed federal legislation, including the Dodd Amendment, which makes the Thomas-Voinovich Amendment permanent, are similarly subject to challenge under the Government Procurement Agreement.

The authors warned that the study does not provide an exhaustive analysis of every potential constitutional or other legal challenge to the myriad state and federal pending or existing legislation that prohibits or restricts outsourcing. Its aim is serve as the beginning of a necessary dialogue that transcends emotion and politics and highlights the core constitutional and legal concerns raised by proposed outsourcing legislation.

States that have introduced legislation to restrict outsourcing include AL, AZ, CA, CO, CT, FL, GA, HI, ID, IL, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, MD, MI, MN, MS, MO, NE, NJ, NM, NY, NC, OH, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, VT, VA, WA, WV and WI.

Advertisement


Permalink: Legal Analysis of Anti-Outsourcing Bill
Tags: outsourcing  analysis  legal  bill  anti  legal+analysis  anti+outsourcing  outsourcing+bill 

Trackback: http://www.creative-weblogging.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.pl/1609



Advertisement


Advertisement


CW ToolbarInstall
RSSrss   | See all blog subscribe options
Googlegoogle   |   What is RSS?
Yahoo!yahoo
AddthisAddThis Feed Button
BloglinesBloglines
Newsletter
Advertisement - Book yours here.

Use our search feature to look for other interesting posts

Just this blog Whole network
Blue Nile, Inc.
Advertisement -
Book yours here..


 
  • Would you like to have a new interactive marketing channel for your company? Learn more about Sponsored Blogs with Creative Weblogging. See how we helped companies like Weblin and cellity reach their goals.
  • Would you like to reach millions of blog readers every day? See you banner on hundreds of blogs with TierOneAds? Stay in control measuring conversion in real time. Register now.
  • Would you like to make more money blogging? Use TierOneAds a new platform that allows you as a blogger to set your prices per impression. Register now.
  • Do you have a blog with more than 50k page views from the US? Let us market your blog and earn great fix payments and bonuses.
  • Would you like to see your text link here? Let us know!
Advertisement
Book yours here.



  • Testimonials

  • 'Great blog. Instead of useless Internet surfing, I read your blog for snapshots of recent information.'

    'I was impressed.... Keep up the good work.'

    'This blog offers a balance uptake in outsourcing'

  • Other blogs in the same channel in the Creative Weblogging Network

Advertisement -
Book yours here..






Advertisement - Book yours here..
 
Tagcloud: Basics Believe It or Not Best Practice Intelligence Opinions & Insights Outsourcing Advisors Outsourcing Issues Outsourcing News Outsourcing Pros and Cons Outsourcing Suppliers Resources Sponsored Post The Lighter Side of Outsourcing