Biggie gets Small
Filed in archive Intelligence on June 12, 2008
In a recent article published in Cybermedia India On-Line, Kurt Potter of Gartner described the diminishing number of mega-deals reported in 2007. Mr. Potter described the market as moving to smaller multi-sourced arrangements in this, the second phase of outsourcing.
While not news to those of us in the industry, and even considering the large deal at BRISTOL-Meyers Squibb reported earlier in this series, 2007 showed a marked decline in the number of billion-dollar "megadeals" to the lowest level in 8 years - and even lower than 2001's $20.3 billion.
What does this say? Maturity in the market, perhaps, with fewer companies trusting the "out-of-sight, out-of-mind" mentality of the first phase of outsourcing. Instead, these companies are trying multi-sourcing, with smaller individual deals with a variety of vendors.
Who wins? Vendors that are nimble, companies that are smart, and advisors that can scale properly to meet the deal requirements. Who loses? Those chasing the billion-dollar deal. Should be an interesting few years.
Permalink: Biggie gets Small
Tags: small deals megadeals mega deals outsourcing gets+small biggie+gets
Trackback: http://www.creative-weblogging.com/publish/mt-tb.pl/126004
Mr Wong
Vote for Biggie gets Small:
|
Rating: 9.00 out of 2 vote(s) cast.
|
Response from:
P.V.Bhaskar
(06/24/08 2:03am)
Good point. Added to the question you raise of who wins and who loses, I'd like to add the question of Who Can. Not everyone can employ multi-sourcing. With every added source, I would imagine that integration and system complexity would rise exponentially. So wouldn't only well-embedded domain expert firms pull this multi-sourcing model off? What do you think?
| RSS | See all blog subscribe options |
|
What is RSS? | |
| Yahoo! |
|
| Addthis |
|
| Bloglines |
|
| Follow us on Twitter! |


